Lundeen EA, Park S, Pan LP, O’Toole T, Matthews K, Blanck HM. Obesity prevalence among adults living in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan counties – United States, 2016. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(23):653–8.
Google Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Health, United States, 2020–2021: Annual Perspective. Hyattsville, MD; 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/report.htm.
Matthews KA, Croft JB, Liu Y, Lu H, Kanny D, Wheaton AG, et al. Health-related behaviors by urban-rural county classification – United States, 2013. MMWR Surveillance Summaries. 2017;66(5):1–8.
Google Scholar
Whitfield GP, Carlson SA, Ussery EN, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, Petersen R. Trends in meeting physical activity guidelines among urban and rural dwelling adults – United States, 2008–2017. MMWR-Morbidity Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(23):513–8.
Google Scholar
Douthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S. Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health. 2015;129(6):611–20.
Google Scholar
Friedman DB, Foster C, Bergeron CD, Tanner A, Kim S-H. A qualitative study of recruitment barriers, motivators, and community-based strategies for increasing clinical trials participation among rural and urban populations. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(5):332–8.
Google Scholar
Baquet CR, Commiskey P, Mullins CD, Mishra SI. Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):24–33.
Google Scholar
Graves JM, Beese SR, Abshire DA, Bennett KJ. How rural is All of Us? Comparing characteristics of rural participants in the National Institute of Health’s All of Us Research Program to other national data sources. J Rural Health. 2024;40:745–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12840.
Seidler EM, Keshaviah A, Brown C, Wood E, Granick L, Kimball AB. Geographic distribution of clinical trials may lead to inequities in access. Clin Invest. 2014;4(4):373–80.
Google Scholar
Brøgger-Mikkelsen M, Ali Z, Zibert JR, Andersen AD, Thomsen SF. Online patient recruitment in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11):e22179.
Google Scholar
Bharucha AE, Wi CI, Srinivasan SG, Choi H, Wheeler PH, Stavlund JR, et al. Participation of rural patients in clinical trials at a multisite academic medical center. J Clin Translational Sci. 2021;5(1):e190.
Google Scholar
Kim NH, Wilson N, Mashburn T, Reist L, Westrick SC, Look K, et al. Lessons learned recruiting a diverse sample of rural study participants during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;97:103344.
Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Torres E, González-Pérez MM, Díaz-Pérez C. Barriers and facilitators to the participation of subjects in clinical trials: an overview of reviews. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021;23:100829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100829.
Watson SE, Smith P, Snowden J, Vaughn V, Cottrell L, Madden CA, et al. Facilitators and barriers to pediatric clinical trial recruitment and retention in rural and community settings: a scoping review of the literature. Cts-Clinical Translational Sci. 2022;15(4):838–53.
Google Scholar
Young L, Montgomery M, Barnason S, Schmidt C, Do V. A conceptual framework for barriers to the recruitment and retention of rural CVD participants in behavior intervention trials. GSTF J Nurs Health Care (JNHC). 2015;2:1–6.
Google Scholar
Punt SE, Kurz DL, Befort CA. Recruitment of men into a pragmatic rural primary care weight loss trial. Am J Mens Health. 2020;14(6):1557988320971917. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320971917.
Befort CA, Bennett L, Christafano D, Klemp JR, Krebill H. Effective recruitment of rural breast cancer survivors into a lifestyle intervention. Psycho-oncology. 2015;24(4):487.
Google Scholar
Young AM, Ballard AM, Cooper HLF. Novel recruitment methods for research among young adults in rural areas who use opioids: cookouts, coupons, and community-based staff. Public Health Rep. 2020;135(6):746–55.
Google Scholar
Vos SC, Adatorwovor R, Roberts MK, Sherman DL, Bonds D, Dunfee MN, et al. Community engagement through social media: a promising low-cost strategy for rural recruitment? J Rural Health. 2023;40(3):467–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12809.
Brockman TA, Shaw O, Wiepert L, Nguyen QA, Kelpin SS, West I, et al. Community engagement strategies to promote recruitment and participation in clinical research among rural communities: a narrative review. J Clin Translational Sci. 2023;7(1):e84. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.16.
Anuruang S, Davidson P, Jackson D, Hickman L. Strategies to enhance recruitment of rural-dwelling older people into community-based trials. Nurse Res. 2015;23(1):40–3.
Google Scholar
Huynh L, Johns B, Liu SH, Vedula SS, Li TJ, Puhan MA. Cost-effectiveness of health research study participant recruitment strategies: a systematic review. Clin Trails. 2014;11(5):576–83.
Google Scholar
Wang H, Kenkel D, Graham ML, Paul LC, Folta SC, Nelson ME, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a community-based cardiovascular disease prevention intervention in medically underserved rural areas. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):315.
Google Scholar
Horn TL, Graber J, Chowdhury SMR, Bursac Z, Krukowski RA. Recruitment strategies for a post cessation weight management trial: a comparison of strategy cost-effectiveness and sample diversity. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022;30:101037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101037.
Wallace MK, Still CH, Jeanblanc AB, Musil CM. Successful and cost-effective Facebook recruitment: is it possible? Results from a longitudinal randomized clinical trial in grandmother caregivers. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2021;93(4):1031–50.
Google Scholar
Jackson J. Expanding opportunities to maximise research recruitment and data collection using digital tools. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2023;26(6):721–31.
Google Scholar
Tsaltskan V, Baez RS, Firestein GS. Cost-effectiveness of social media advertising as a recruitment tool: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Translational Sci. 2023;7(1):e180. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.596.
Seguin-Fowler RA, Hanson KL, Villarreal D, Rethorst CD, Ayine P, Folta SC, et al. Evaluation of a civic engagement approach to catalyze built environment change and promote healthy eating and physical activity among rural residents: a cluster (community) randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–17.
Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) Codes. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-commuting-area-codes.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health Resources and Services Administration. Find shortage areas: MUA/P by state and county. https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/shortage-areas/mua-find.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Health Resources & Services Administration. HPSA Find. https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/shortage-areas/hpsa-find.
Hanson KL, Marshall GA, Graham ML, Villarreal DL, Volpe LC, Seguin-Fowler RA. Identifying and removing fraudulent attempts to enroll in a human health improvement intervention trial in rural communities. Methods Protocols. 2024;7(6):93.
Google Scholar
Arigo D, Pagoto S, Carter-Harris L, Lillie SE, Nebeker C. Using social media for health research: methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery. Digit Health. 2018;4:2055207618771757.
Google Scholar
Bessell E, Markovic TP, Caterson ID, Hendy C, Burk J, Picone T, Fuller NR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of recruitment strategies in a large diabetes prevention trial conducted across two sites in Sydney, Australia. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024;137:107421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2023.107421.
Estabrooks P, Wen Y, Hedrick V, Reinholt M, Dohm E, Zoellner J. A pragmatic examination of active and passive recruitment methods to improve the reach of community lifestyle programs: The Talking Health Trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:1–10.
Google Scholar
Bracken K, Hague W, Keech A, Conway A, Handelsman DJ, Grossmann M, et al. Recruitment of men to a multi-centre diabetes prevention trial: an evaluation of traditional and online promotional strategies. Trials. 2019;20:1–14.
Google Scholar
Ley C, Duan H, Parsonnet J. Recruitment into antibody prevalence studies: a randomized trial of postcards vs. letters as invitations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023;23(1):170.
Google Scholar
Brenner PS, Buskirk TD. Scratch the scratch-off: testing prepaid and conditional incentives with postcard and letter invitations in a web-push design with an address-based sample. Field Methods. 2022;34(1):20–35.
Google Scholar
Parker C, Scott S, Geddes A. Snowball Sampling. In: Atkinson P, Delamont S, Cernat A, Sakshaug J, Williams R, editors. SAGE Research Methods Foundations. 2019. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831710.
U.S. Census Bureau. DP05. ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates. 2021 5-Year Estimates. https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP1Y2021.DP05.
National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine. Improving representation in clinical trials and research: building research equity for women and underrepresented groups. In: Bibbins-Domingo K, Helman A, editors. The National Academies Collection: Reports. funded by National Institutes of Health: National Academies; 2022. https://doi.org/10.17226/26479.
Murphy AL, Turner JP, Rajda M, Allen KG, Pinter K, Gardner DM. Effectiveness and cost analysis of methods used to recruit older adult sedative users to a deprescribing randomized controlled trial during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exploratory Res Clin Social Pharm. 2023;9:100214.
Google Scholar
